My friend Dennis Prager explains, in just 6 minutes, why the Islamist-Israeli conflict is not the incredibly complicated issue claimed by the, um, nuanced thinkers of the left.
In fact, a recent poll among Palestinians revelas a people committed to Sharia law and the annihilation of the Jewish State. Granting such a society the status of an independant state would be a crime against humanity.
A Palestinian state should be run by Sharia Law. 55%
A Palestinian state should be run by civil law. 35%
The best goal is for a two state solution that keeps two states living side by side. 30%
The real goal should be to start with two states but then move to it all being one Palestinian state. 60%
Israel has a permanent right to exist as a homeland for the Jewish people. 23%
Over time Palestinians must work to get back all the land for a Palestinian state. 66%
In 2000, President Bill Clinton proposed a Palestinian-Israeli peace agreement in which the Palestinians would receive an independent state, which included Gaza and nearly all of the West Bank, using the 1967 green line, exchanging Israeli land for larger settlements. It made East Jerusalem the capital of the Palestinian state, with control over Palestinian quarters of the Old City. Yasir Arafat rejected this offer. In retrospect, do you wish Arafat had accepted this peace agreement - yes or no?
Yes: 24%
No: 71%
As long as the Palestinians behave like a bunch of genocidal-yearning barbarians there is nothing to talk about.
